The myriad of jigs and fixtures being built just to hold a board, the clamshell tester which could be 3D printed, and the countless documents involved are foundational to a real product. Some of this happens in the design stage, but that is preparation for things to come. When you design a PCB, we know that you are concerned with programming, testing, and validating the PCB in multiple ways. One is a point solution, whereas the other is a true reflection of the end-to-end workflow we experience as engineers. Autodesk EAGLE - Why Fusion 360? Why Now?Ĭomparing EAGLE to Fusion 360 is an unfair comparison. It also has the tools to design and 3D print models. The result enables you to get every part of your job done right and done well. The manufacturing capabilities in Fusion 360 enable you to create parts and assemblies, simulate toolpaths, and generate code for CNC machines. The intent was always to bring together the solutions Autodesk has for each stage of the design and manufacturing journey. As folks here quip, “if we intended to keep that a secret, we would have picked a better name than ‘Fusion.” Integrating electronics and mechanical design in a way never before possible. This was a great beginning, but it wasn’t anything like where we were headed. What we intended from the beginning was the ultimate integration of all the essential elements for true product design and manufacturing. When EAGLE became a part of the Autodesk portfolio, we began a new chapter. It even had enough horsepower for those willing to dig deeper into its methodology(ies). EAGLE provided flexibility and an ability to personalize the software. Autodesk EAGLE? In this post, I’m going to share what made the move to Fusion 360 electronics the right path forward in our evolution from a point tool to a comprehensive product design solution.įor 30+ years, EAGLE was the solution for the user concerned with designing and manufacturing a PCB. Many users in our community have asked: what’s the difference between Fusion 360 vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |